Tuesday, December 7, 2010
A CALL FOR TRANSPARENCY BY MPPI, WHICH IS ANYTHING BUT TRANSPARENT
Is it OK to use one's media megaphone to do a favor for your boss?
Happens all the time. Case in point:
A Baltimore Sun columnist, Marta H. Mossburg, in a column today (Dec 7 2010) invited the public to attend a conference in Annapolis, sponsored by her other employer, the Maryland Public Policy Institute.
Interesting that the conference is to focus on "transparency" when the Maryland Public Policy Institute is anything but transparent about its own funding.
According to the MPPI website today, Robert Ehrlich sits on the MPPI board. Does this right-wing millionaire put money into MPPI - so it can bash the Democratic majority Maryland legislature?
Here are some questions that are not likely to be addressed by the MMPI-sponsored transparency conference - or in any other venue run by MPPI:
Who gives the biggest dollars to MPPI?
Why does MPPI push only right wing and libertarian solutions to fiscal matters?
Why does MPPI hire people, such as Ms. Mossburg, with no discernible qualifications to propose economic solutions to Maryland's budgetary challenges?
In its call for transparency, why does MPPI ignore the lack of transparency in the private sector, of, say, "Tea Party" front outfits who are, rumor has it, wholly funded by right wing billionaires?
Saturday, December 4, 2010
THE STATE OF SOCIETY TODAY - DECEMBER 2010
Here is an important statement about the state of our society today.
This thirteen minute speech by Senator Bernie Sanders is worth your thirteen minutes.
Then, we ought to get angry and get in touch with our Washington DC elected officials. Let them know how you feel.
Labels:
Senator Bernie Sanders,
Washington DC
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
JUDICIAL AND LEGAL ETHICS IN MARYLAND: HOW LOW CAN YOU GO?
Who is worthy of greater public condemnation, a lawyer who exchanges sex for a controlled substance or a lawyer who complains, truthfully, about the misconduct of a federal judge?
Well, what you think doesn't matter. What matters is what the judges think.
In Maryland, the judiciary, by a large margin, prefers the sexual predator with a law license to the honest lawyer, who files a formal complaint about a judge.
The sexual predator get a little frown from the judges, while the honest lawyer, who complains about the misconduct of a federal judge, gets to pick another profession.
Arguably (as lawyers like to say) a Maryland attorney ought never to lose his/her law license, for making a truthful complaint about a federal judge.
Arguably. But honesty is not the big deal you might expect it to be to the Maryland judiciary.
An attorney who does complain - about a federal judge who (1) ignores procedural rules to benefit his former law partners (2) takes money gifts from litigators (3) violates the federal judicial complaint rules and the Canons of Judicial Ethics and (4) is in business with lawyers in his court - a lawyer who objects to all this ought to be protected - if not congratulated - for coming forward. Arguably, but never mind.
The Judicial apparatus in Maryland did not like the fact that I complained - truthfully - about the misconduct of a federal judge. My punishment - 18 months suspended law license.
In fact, my suspension amounts to a disbarment. I am not going to apologize to Chief Judge Bell for coming forward as I did. I am not going to promise, from now on, to look the other way.
Judge Bell ought to apologize to me and restore my license - after admitting that I was telling the truth about the federal judge. But that is not the way our judicial system works.
Strict adherence to the factual record takes a back seat, in Maryland, to another judicial value: protection of a miscreant judicial colleague - a fellow jurist who ignores the ethical strictures that are supposed to protect the interests of petitioners and attorneys, alike.
The judge about whom I complained ought to have been investigated and replaced. My clients should have been protected from such a "judge." But Judge Bell and his employees among the disciplinary counsel finally have admitted I was telling the truth. But telling the truth is not enough. You loose your license for telling the truth about athe misconduct of a federal judge.
Never mind. Experience is wisdom. I am now wise to the bright line rule that governs judicial complaints in Maryland: the judges cover for each other. They prefer to destroy the career of an officer of their own court, than admit that a federal judge is a miscreant who ignores his serious ethical obligations. http://www.courts.state.md.us/attygrievance/sanctions08.html
Never mind and beware.
Beware the sexual predator who is allowed to hang on to his law license after a little bitty Oh My, from the be-robed solons who run the judiciary in Maryland.
In Maryland the controlling doctrine can be summarized this way: a lawyer who forces himself sexually on someone in exchange for a controlled drug is viewed in a much kinder light than a lawyer who complains - truthfully - about a judge-on-the-take.
The judicial soft light glows ever softer the second time around; this attorney had been suspended "briefly" (Baltimore Sun May 18, 2010) once before for sexual misconduct with a client.
The sort of lawyer - two-times a predator - who coerce sex-for-drugs earns a 60 day suspension. Then it's back to 'business' as usual in the Maryland courts. http://mdcourts.gov/opinions/coa/2010/2a09ag.pdf
Disgusting? But as legal as can be.
Get sex for drugs or have sexual contact with a client if you can. But if you are an officer of he court, don't complain about a judge. Then, you are really going to be in trouble with the other judges.
In Maryland, judicial ethics and legal ethics are like the game of limbo: how low can you go?
Well, what you think doesn't matter. What matters is what the judges think.
In Maryland, the judiciary, by a large margin, prefers the sexual predator with a law license to the honest lawyer, who files a formal complaint about a judge.
The sexual predator get a little frown from the judges, while the honest lawyer, who complains about the misconduct of a federal judge, gets to pick another profession.
Arguably (as lawyers like to say) a Maryland attorney ought never to lose his/her law license, for making a truthful complaint about a federal judge.
Arguably. But honesty is not the big deal you might expect it to be to the Maryland judiciary.
An attorney who does complain - about a federal judge who (1) ignores procedural rules to benefit his former law partners (2) takes money gifts from litigators (3) violates the federal judicial complaint rules and the Canons of Judicial Ethics and (4) is in business with lawyers in his court - a lawyer who objects to all this ought to be protected - if not congratulated - for coming forward. Arguably, but never mind.
The Judicial apparatus in Maryland did not like the fact that I complained - truthfully - about the misconduct of a federal judge. My punishment - 18 months suspended law license.
In fact, my suspension amounts to a disbarment. I am not going to apologize to Chief Judge Bell for coming forward as I did. I am not going to promise, from now on, to look the other way.
Judge Bell ought to apologize to me and restore my license - after admitting that I was telling the truth about the federal judge. But that is not the way our judicial system works.
Strict adherence to the factual record takes a back seat, in Maryland, to another judicial value: protection of a miscreant judicial colleague - a fellow jurist who ignores the ethical strictures that are supposed to protect the interests of petitioners and attorneys, alike.
The judge about whom I complained ought to have been investigated and replaced. My clients should have been protected from such a "judge." But Judge Bell and his employees among the disciplinary counsel finally have admitted I was telling the truth. But telling the truth is not enough. You loose your license for telling the truth about athe misconduct of a federal judge.
Never mind. Experience is wisdom. I am now wise to the bright line rule that governs judicial complaints in Maryland: the judges cover for each other. They prefer to destroy the career of an officer of their own court, than admit that a federal judge is a miscreant who ignores his serious ethical obligations. http://www.courts.state.md.us/attygrievance/sanctions08.html
Never mind and beware.
Beware the sexual predator who is allowed to hang on to his law license after a little bitty Oh My, from the be-robed solons who run the judiciary in Maryland.
In Maryland the controlling doctrine can be summarized this way: a lawyer who forces himself sexually on someone in exchange for a controlled drug is viewed in a much kinder light than a lawyer who complains - truthfully - about a judge-on-the-take.
The judicial soft light glows ever softer the second time around; this attorney had been suspended "briefly" (Baltimore Sun May 18, 2010) once before for sexual misconduct with a client.
The sort of lawyer - two-times a predator - who coerce sex-for-drugs earns a 60 day suspension. Then it's back to 'business' as usual in the Maryland courts. http://mdcourts.gov/opinions/coa/2010/2a09ag.pdf
Disgusting? But as legal as can be.
Get sex for drugs or have sexual contact with a client if you can. But if you are an officer of he court, don't complain about a judge. Then, you are really going to be in trouble with the other judges.
In Maryland, judicial ethics and legal ethics are like the game of limbo: how low can you go?
Wednesday, August 25, 2010
A GOOD IDEA or VINDICTIVE GIBBERISH?
Like the young king, Henry VIII, I was too busy yesterday, attending my usual five-times daily Mass to catch up with Thomas Schaller’s opinion piece (“The Problem is not Islam but Orthodoxy,” Baltimore Sun August 24, 2010).
The Eighth English Henry solved his compulsory Mass attendance problem by announcing that no one in England ought to go to Mass, ever. It has taken a while, but Henry’s no-mo’-Mass dream is coming true in England, where the immigrant Catholic and Moslem communities are vibrant but where the Anglican Church is to religious attendance what a skeleton is to a living body.
Speaking of living bodies, Henry’s against Anne Boleyn’s gave special urgency to Henry’s no-mo’-Mass rule. Cynicism is everywhere.
Which brings me to Mr. Schaller’s proposal that we honor the victims of Sept 11, 2001 by building what Mr. Schaller calls “a place” that “celebrates the idea that we ought to divorce our public behaviors from our beliefs in God – and for good measure, respect those who don’t believe in god at all.”
Brilliant. But Mr. Schaller forgot to announce how much he will personally kick in for such “a place.”
The failure to actually give cash undermines the idea. An unwillingness to put up personal money to get something done highlights the likely future of philanthropy in a non- religious society. Since we are taxed, why put up any personal money for “a place” of any kind?
Speaking of “place” the free-floating quote attributed to Jesus in Luke’s Gospel begs for context. As with many ancient texts, the original setting of a given statement often is not apparent in the final version, committed to writing decades later.
Jesus stated, according to the Gospel of Luke and Schaller, “bring them here and slaughter them before me.”
Did Jesus really say that?
More likely, this parabolic summation is the stark (and therefore memorable) sermonic highlight from an ancient Christian preacher, who wanted to explain to his tiny flock why their present dreary circumstances are as nothing compared to the cosmic culmination which awaited them. This would not be the last time when vindictive gibberish would be memorialized in a sermon.
By the way, just as Mr. Schaller was kidding about building a secular “place” in lower Manhattan, I was kidding about going to Mass five times a day. I check my Inbox that often but, since I am as secular as the next guy, that’s about it.
Labels:
Anne Boleyn,
Baltimore Sun,
Catholic,
Gospel,
Henry VIII,
Islam,
Jesus,
Manhattan,
St. Luke,
Thomas Schaller
Thursday, August 19, 2010
THE JUDGES ARE HONEST
'The judges are honest'
An old oaken maxim
With the bark coming off.
We knew it wasn’t true.
Know it now, in despond.
Our clients were too poor
To win vindication
From one with hand held out
To old pals with money.
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
ANDY HARRIS THINKS NYC CONSTRUCTION PLANS "BLATANTLY DISRESPECTFUL" - BUT WHERE ARE THE FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS?
The Baltimore Sun reported (August 17, 2010) that Andy Harris, First District GOP candidate for Congress, says that the locally-approved construction of an Islamic community/prayer center in lower Manhattan is "blatantly disrespectful" because it will be located close to Sept 11's Ground Zero.
Mr. Harris is entitled to an opinion. Here are one or two follow-up questions that ought to be asked:
What is the role of Congress in a local zoning issue?
Should the feds spend tax $$ to fight a construction project that is in conformity with local zoning?
Ought there be a moratorium (or federal law) banning the building of Christian churches near the bombed federal building in Okla City - since Timothy McVey was a self-identified Christian?
Does Andy Harris know that many Sept 11 victims were Muslim? Has Mr Harris troubled himself to find out if their surviving relatives and friends agree that the proposed construction is 'offensive?' Might a community /prayer center near Ground Zero be consoling to them?
Should local zoning regs forbid houses of worship (synagogues, Baptist churches, etc) if non-communicants might be 'offended' at their construction?
Labels:
Andy Harris,
Baltimore Sun,
Islam,
local zoning,
Manhattan,
Muslim
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
BOZO GETS A GAVEL
Who is the integrity terminator in Maryland?
It's a competition between Senate President Mike Miller and Chief Judge Robert Bell, with O'Malley and Gansler jostling for third and State Senators placing friendly bets.
In March 2010, the Maryland Senate voted overwhelmingly to approve the O'Malley recommendation for a judgeship in Anne Arundel County for the son of Senate President Mike Miller.
Recall that three lawyer members of the judicial appointments commission resigned, objecting to a lack of qualifications in the nominee and also to improper interference with their deliberations over Mike Miller III for a judgeship. When Miller III was not recommended at first, Governor O'Malley simply asked cronies on the commission for more names; Miller III appeared on the burnished new list. Presto! Brand new judge!
Both before the Senate voted and subsequently, I asked a number of elected officials to look into the possibility of nepotism and other misconduct in this appointment.
Before the vote, I wrote, via their official e-mail, to members of the Maryland Senate. Not a single Senator acknowledged or responded.
E-mail and Certified mail to Governor Martin O'Malley remains unanswered.
E-mail to Lt. Governor Anthony G Brown remains unanswered.
Registered mail to Attorney General Douglas Gansler remains unanswered.
E-mail to the Maryland ACLU remains unacknowledged.
Public service in Maryland includes not responding to integrity-inquiries. This is necessary because office-holding in Maryland also includes getting your relatives and your political pals' relatives on to the public payroll.
Chief Judge Bell has written back that the appointment of Maryland judges is none of his business.
Judge Bell did not offer to refer my inquiry to anyone whose business it might be to keep unqualified people off the bench in Maryland or to see that the judicial appointments process was not tainted by undue influence.
The Maryland judiciary, increasingly, is larded with the relatives of Maryland elected officials. Who cares? Whose job is it to put a stop to this?
Are elected officials the custodians of judicial integrity in Maryland?
Nope. The office-holders are the very ones elbowing others aside so their children, spouses, in-laws, can suck the public teet.
Is the Maryland State Bar Association the custodian of judicial integrity in Maryland? Forget about it. For the well-connected attorney, there is no better judge to stand before than one who is grateful to the lawyer who engineered the judicial appointment.
Is the Maryland ACLU the custodian of judicial integrity in Maryland? Naw. Why should the ACLU question the integrity of the judicial appointment process? After all, Senate President Miller, known as a vindictive shouter, can de-fund any number of projects and programs, that the ACLU wants to tout. Looking away while Bozo the Clown puts on judicial robes is a small price to pay . . .
In Maryland, judicial integrity is a pretty low priority for everyone, including, sadly, Chief Judge Robert Bell.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
THE JESUS MAN - FATHER JOE MUTH
Father Joe Muth, pastor of St Matthew and Blessed Sacrament Roman Catholic Churches, has completed thirty-six years as a priest of the Archdiocese of Baltimore.
A native of Baltimore, Father Joe is a tireless pastor, whose commitment to his Church and his two parishes is a 24-7 proposition. Father Joe celebrates daily Mass for his parishioners and on many occasions throughout the week, for others, as well.
A vital, popular and well-regarded preacher, Father Joe often conducts retreats and seminars on a variety of subjects. He has traveled to many nations in Africa and elsewhere. The African nations Fr Joe has visited include, Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe and Rwanda.
Much of Father Joe' work is focused on social ministry, yet without neglecting the uniquely priestly work of counselling and spiritual guidance offered to individual parishioners.
Fr. Joe's expression of the Christian Faith entails an explicit welcome to all peoples of all races and nations. Fr Joe's ministry is international in every sense. His enthusiastic welcome to immigrants has made Saint Matthew Church a multi-racial and multi-ethnic community of faith. Over forty nationalities are represented among the parishioners at St Matthew Church. The Immigrant Outreach Service Center, which Father Joe founded in 2000, is housed at St Matthew Church. The Center focuses on family reunification, adjustment of status and political asylum.
Father Joe Muth Jr, we salute you on the completion of your thirty-sixth year as a Priest.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
ARIZONA - THE NEW MISSISSIPPI
Do the Orioles play the Diamondbacks this year? If so, here is an idea from a British friend, that ought to be implemented at Camden Yards:
"I'm thinking, when the Diamondbacks play, someone should walk onto the field and demand their papers. Every inning. It's baseball: America's Pastime, we have to be sure."
"I'm thinking, when the Diamondbacks play, someone should walk onto the field and demand their papers. Every inning. It's baseball: America's Pastime, we have to be sure."
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
The Senate President's son up for a judgeship? Puleeeeesee.
A vote to confirm Mike Miller III as a district judge may be a career-defining vote for each member of the Maryland Senate.
Are you there to represent the best interests of your district or there merely to help Mike Miller II find a nice job on the public payroll for Mike Miller III?
Three attorneys on the nominations commission resigned, objecting to this appointee as unqualified and also objecting to pressure on them to approve this appointment. That ought to have been enough to kill this nomination.
A Maryland senator who votes to seat on a district court bench the son of the Senate President is casting a vote for nepotism. This would be a vote for a sinecure not a judgeship.
Instead of a lemming-like vote in favor, the Senators ought to send this nomination back to the Executive Nominations Committee (Senator Delores Kelly, Chair) where testimony can be elicited as to (1) WHY three members of the commission objected to this appointment (2) HOW the commission was reconstituted so as to pass this nominee on to the Governor.
The importance of a hearing is obvious. It is serious and extraordinary for three attorneys, who live and work in the jurisdiction in question, to object to a judicial appointment on the grounds of unqualification and political interference.
The governor's executive staff need to be examined under oath before the Executive Nominations Committee. Also, the three lawyers (who have placed their practices in some degree of jeopardy already) ought to be at least minimally protected further, by a Senate subpoena. They are:
Eileen Powers - 410-573-2900
Marysabel Rodriguez-Nanney - 4 10 268-5070
Marysabel Rodriguez-Nanney - 4
Paula Peters - 410-990-0090
It is integrity-time for each member of the Maryland Senate. The Senate best not simply create a judge out of the son of the Senate President.
To write this sentence is simply to state the obvious: Mike Miller III is being considered for a judgeship simply because Mike Miller II is a powerful guy.
Because Thomas V Miller is a powerful guy, the Governor simply reconstituted the commission and got the word out that he wanted Miller III to be recommended to him; the Governor manipulated the appointments procedure merely to get the son's name in front of him.
This is a sham. This is ugly. This is blatant politicking in favor of putting public money into the pockets of a powerful guy's family.
If this nomination is approved, the Senate will have abdicated its duty to protect the public fisc and the state judiciary against political interference.
If this nomination is approved, Chief Judge Robert Bell will be asked to conduct his own, independent investigation into a matter, which obviously compromises the integrity and the independence of the Maryland Judiciary.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
ADIEU DEAR COMRADE, YOUR MISSION IS FULFILL'D
ADIEU DEAR COMRADE, YOUR MISSION IS FULFILL'D
(Whitman, Adieu to a Soldier)
JAMES E. DORLAND, 41ST OVI
by Richard Baldwin Cook
Excerpts reprinted from the OHIO CIVIL WAR GENEALOGY JOURNAL, Vol XIV Issue 1 (#53) (2010, pp. 20-25) Published quarterly by the Ohio Genealogical Society, ogs@ogs.org
(OCWGJ EDITOR’S NOTE: The following sketch is taken from All Of The Above II (Nativabooks LLC, 2008), available at bookstores and on line at amazon.com and elsewhere. The author, Richard Baldwin Cook, is the great-grandson of James E. Dorland. In this and a companion volume, All Of The Above I, Cook has traced dozens of genealogies from Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky back to the colonies, and many of them back several generations in England, Ireland, Scotland and continental Europe.)
James E. Dorland (1844-1915) was born in the village of Holmesville OH on 15 March 1844 . James' father, Ezekiel Dorland (1812-1846), died when James was two years old. James' mother was Lucinda Haley Dorland (Lash) (1818-1893). James’ brother Richard (1839-?) was older than James by five years. The 1860 federal census records Lucinda Dorland and sons Richard, 21, and James, 16, living in Salt River Township, Wayne County OH. [. . .]
Lucinda was buried (Lot 16, Square 3 in East Union Cemetery, East Union Township) beside Ezekiel, who died on 23 April 1846 at age 32. Also buried here is Mary E. Dorland (Jan 1842-24 Aug 1855). [. . .]
In August 1862, shortly after his 18th birthday, James enlisted as a Private in Company C, 41st Ohio Volunteer Infantry. He served to the close of the war. [. . .]
On 15 March 1863 , James was in a convalescent camp near Nashville for a respiratory problem. "I have a bad cold," James wrote to his mother. "I can hardly speak out loud. I was on guard last night and it made my cold worse." James' main concern on that occasion (which was also his nineteenth birthday) was that his brother Richard be stopped from trying to bring James home.
"You know how I would feel if he would come down here and have to go home without me and I know or almost know that he would. There would be ten chances to one for him to for I have seen too many cases like that. Some brings their children citizens clothes and take them home but I would sooner stay my two years than to go home that way. Tell him to stay at home until I send for him."
All of James' surviving letters to his mother are vaguely descriptive of warfare and the fighting he was in, as he tries to adopt a youthful bravado without terrifying his mother about the dangers. On 1 June 1864 , James wrote, "We were ordered to make a charge, which we did, with great slaughter." The letter was penned "near Pumpkin Vine Creek," Georgia . Three months later, James, by then one of Sherman's seasoned veterans, wrote again to his mother, reporting with slight drama and no embellishment, "We marched about 50 miles to get the rebels out of Atlanta and we took possession and are now laying in camp." (Editor’s note: James is most likely referring to the 27 May 1864 battle at Pickett’s Mills GA, in which the 41st recorded 108 men killed and wounded, out of the 262 who went into the engagement. Discussion of this battle is included in the regimental history, cited below, pages 82-89.)
JAMES’ LIFE AFTER THE WAR
Arabelle America Ireland (1850-1895) and James were married in Belle’s parents' home in Columbia City IN on 11 October 1871 . The date is recorded in a formal certificate of marriage in the handwriting and signature of the minister, Hugh Wells, the pastor of Grace Lutheran Church in Columbia City .
James moved eventually to Louisville KY , where he conducted a profitable career as managing representative for the American Book Company. He provided textbooks to the public schools of Louisville and the near region. The 1911 Louisville City Directory (Carson's 1911 Directory, page 0353) lists James' residence at 1307 S. First St . It was in this stately residence that James and Belle raised their two daughters, Blanche and Ethyl, during the closing decades of the nineteenth century. James may have lived in Illinois prior to settling in Louisville . This is suggested by the federal census of 1900, which recorded that his second daughter, Ethyl, 23, had been born in Illinois in 1876-77.
In Louisville , James was known as a gregarious and popular man. In keeping with his Dorland heritage, James was an active Presbyterian. This Calvinist legacy extended back to James' grandfather, for whom he was named. The first James Dorland (1 Aug 1781-2 Feb 1858) was himself a Presbyterian lay reader. (Editor’s note: to distinguish the elder James from his grandson, the primary subject of this article, the elder James will be designated as James-1.) James-1 was the great-grandson of Gerret (Garret) Dorlandt (Dorland) (1707-1774), who was an original subscriber of the first Dutch Reformed Church in Harlingen NJ and served the congregation as both deacon and elder.
Daughter Blanche married Cecil Virgil Cook. What would the fathers of the bride and groom have talked about at the wedding reception? We have no record or family recollection, which might guide our speculation. Joshua Flood Cook (1834-1912), father of the groom, was of a slave-owning family. At age 27 in 1861, Joshua had resigned the presidency of a female "institute" in Kentucky to become a Baptist chaplain in the Southern cause. J.F. Cook had buried more than one Confederate soldier, including his young brother-in-law, Willie Farmer, who died in 1862, shortly after the battle of Shiloh , from a shattered hip. (For additional Cook and Farmer family details, please see All Of The Above I & II). In his memoir, Old Kentucky (1908), Joshua recorded with pride that his brothers “rode with Morgan” on rebel raids into James E. Dorland's home state of Ohio . The deepest penetration into Ohio by John Hunt Morgan and his "Raiders" was to Lisbon in July 1863. Lisbon was the first Ohio hometown of James Dorland's grandparents, Mary and James-1 Dorland. A monument five miles south of Lisbon commemorates Morgan's capture.
Although James Dorland had settled in Louisville after the Civil War, he had reached manhood in the uniform of the Federal army. By age twenty, he was a battle-hardened veteran with three years service, much of it under the command of General William T. Sherman. By his 21st birthday, James had seen much death and destruction and probably had caused some of it. During the war he had written to his mother that he had participated in "much slaughter." No doubt James had buried many a young Ohio boy like himself, to say nothing of many a 'rebel' boy as well.
James died in New York City on 14 January 1915 , while visiting his daughter Ethyl Barnes Qualey and her husband, Joe. James, a member of the Warren Memorial Presbyterian Church (4th and Broadway) in Louisville, was eulogized as "one of the best loved men in the city."
JAMES DORLAND'S PATERNAL ANCESTRY
James' father was Ezekiel Dorland (14 Sep 1812 -23 Apr 1846 ), dead at age 34, and his mother was Lucinda Haley Dorland Lash (1818/20-1893). Although orphaned of his dad, James knew both his paternal grandparents; he had been named for his father's father, James-1 Dorland (1 Aug 1781-2 Feb 1858.) Grandfather James married Mary Moore (22 Nov 1785-16 Feb 1869) in southwestern Pennsylvania on 11 Dec 1804 . James-1 and Mary made their homes in Lisbon (called at first New Lisbon Village ). They subsequently moved to the nearby village of Fredericksburg OH. Mary is listed in the 1860 Fredericksburg census, where she and James-1 had raised eighteen children. Yes, eighteen children. She is thought to have been buried in Crestline OH.
James' Moore great-grandparents moved from Pennsylvania to Lisbon OH , not long after their daughter's PA wedding in 1804. The move to Ohio is certain at this time because Mary's father, John Moore, was a reader in the Presbyterian Church in Lisbon from 7 Aug 1807 until 19 Sep 1812 . To function as a lay reader usually meant a person conducted the regular weekly service in the absence of an ordained minister. From the fact of congregational leadership and public reading by her father, we infer that Mary came from an educated background, whose Reformed religious principles would have fitted her comfortably into the Dutch Reformed traditions of her husband's ancestors.
DORLANDS - FROM HOLLAND TO AMERICA
The word "dorlandt" appears to be a Dutch compound, "dor" (sterile, barren) and "landt," and therefore can be taken to mean 'unproductive soil.' There is no clear reason how 'Dorlandt’ came to be a proper last name. Absence of certain etymology is a characteristic of many names. A reasonable speculation suggests this was a convenience, developing out of the circumstance that surnames became both needed and common as Europeans, whether peasants or privileged, became more mobile during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. You could call yourself or were called by whatever moniker identified you most conveniently to your original place or people. The Dorlandts were Dutch people from, it seems, barren farmland. [. . .]
The first of James E. Dorland's ancestors to have traveled an angry sea from Bruekelen, Holland to Brooklyn, New York Colony was Lambert Janse Dorlandt (1639-1720) [. . .] On 16 April 1663, Lambert arrived in New Amsterdam on the ship Bomekoe (Spotted Cow). There may still be found an historical marker on a farm north of Sunset Road, Montgomery Township , NJ , which was placed on Lambert’s grave after the headstone was lost. There are recent reports that the farm house he built along Sunset Road about 1710 is still standing.
[. . .]
Lambert Janse Dorlandt married Hermina Janse Peters (Hermptje Janse Pieterse) in 1665. Lambert and Hermina had eight children, the oldest son (and third child) being Gerret Janse Dorlandt (abt 1666-1736). Gerret was born in Brooklyn and died in Somerset NJ . He married Jannetje Jansen Schenck (abt 1673-bf 1695) on 20 May 1692 in Brooklyn . He then married Marytje ______ (abt 1665-abt 1751). Gerret and Marytje had four children, including Gerret (Garret) Dorlandt (Dorland) (1707-1774), who married Hilitie (Matilda) Van Arsdalen (1712-1774) on 13 March 1730/31 in Harlingen , Somerset County NJ . Garret Dorland was an original subscriber of the Dutch Reformed Church in Harlingen and served as both deacon and elder of the church. Garret’s body was reportedly moved from a family cemetery to the Harlingen Reformed Church Cemetery.
Garret and Hilitie Dorlandt were the parents of ten or eleven children, including Lucas (Luke) Dorland (1748/9-aft 1787), who became the husband of Eleanor (Aulche) ______ (1752-16 Oct 1835) in about 1773 in New York . As far as is known, Luke and Eleanor lived their lives in Harlingen , NJ . This Lucas has been incorrectly identified as the founder of Warren Wilson College in Ashville , NC . (See below.)
The youngest of the four children of Lucas and Eleanor Dorland was James-1(1781-1858), who was born in Harlingen , NJ on 1 Aug 1781 , married Mary Moore on 11 Dec 1804 , and died on 4 Feb 1858 in Fredricksburg OH.
This Dorland line, traced forward from Lambert, Garrett-1, Garrett-2, and James-1 remained for generations in New Jersey and then migrated from New Jersey to Ohio. [. . .]
“COLOR, CASTE, OR CLASS DISTINCTIONS ARE AN EVIL THING”
Some researchers do not list all of the children of Mary and James-1: they have only Luke Dorland (1815-1897), his wife Juliette E. Goodfellow (1824-1897), and their son, Charles Johnson Dorland (?-?). There is good reason to focus on Luke and Juliette Dorland, who left an impressive historic legacy. They were Presbyterian missionaries, employed by the Presbyterian Board of Home Missions. In 1867, working in the mountains of Western North Carolina , they founded Scotia Seminary for Negro Women in Concord NC . Luke was the school’s first president. (In 1932, the name of Scotia Seminary was changed to Barber-Scotia College.) Historian Glenda Elizabeth Gilmore has written (see Sources, below) that Scotia Seminary’s ”biracial faculty oversaw a curriculum calculated to give students the knowledge, social consciousness, and sensibilities of New England ladies, with a strong dose of Boston egalitarianism sprinkled in.” Seminary President Luke Dorland declared that “skilled hands must be directed by a sound mind in a sound body, motivated by a zeal to serve others." An early Scotia student, Mary McLeod, recalled her northern white teachers’ insistence that “the color of a person's skin has nothing to do with his brains, and that color, caste, or class distinctions are an evil thing."
In 1867, Luke led the organization of the Bellefonte Presbyterian Church in Concord NC . In 1869 and 1872, he was pastor of the Second Presbyterian Church in Concord NC , and in 1884 was pastor of the African Presbyterian Church, also in Concord . Luke and Juliette remained active even in retirement. In 1887, they secured financial backing from northern Presbyterians and founded yet another school in the NC mountains, the Dorland Institute in Hot Springs , Madison County NC . Luke and Juliette provided the early instruction in their home and erected the first buildings at their own expense. In 1914, the school was described as worth $40,000, providing instruction, room and board for 70 girls as well as 30 boys, who were also taught farming practices. In addition to the boarders, there were 60 non-residential students. The Dorland Institute merged in 1918 with the Bell Institute to form the Dorland-Bell School, which merged in 1942 with the Ashville Farm School, which was the predecessor of Warren Wilson College in Ashville, NC. [. . .]
Just as James-1 in the eighteenth century left behind his Dutch reformed traditions and family in New Jersey to settle in Ohio , the nineteenth century found some of the Ohio-based Dorlands striking out on adventures of their own. Some of these seem to have been stimulated more by wanderlust than from any well designed plan. In March 1852, a certain Garret Dorland of Perry Township OH led a one-hundred member company of men to the California Gold Fields. The party included a Cornelius Dorland as well. The company traveled by boat down the Ohio River to Cairo IL , up the Mississippi to Independence MO , and then overland to California . As far as is known, they found no gold but did manage to establish Dorland progeny throughout the far West.
JAMES E. DORLAND'S MATERNAL ANCESTRY: HALEY, COTTON, RICKETTS, CHENEY, NICHOLSON, POWELL, JONES
James’ mother, Lucinda Haley (1818/20-1893) was the daughter of Richard Healy (1786-1824) and Rachael Cotton (1785-?). They were married 16 April 1807 , possibly in Wayne County OH . Richard died in Salt Creek Township , Holmes (formerly Wayne ) County OH . His parents were John Healy (?-?) and Sarah Wilson (?-?).
Rachael was one of eleven children born to John Cotton (1748-15 July 1818) and Mary Ricketts (15 July 1755-29 Nov 1833). They were married 2 June 1774 , probably in Anne Arundel County MD. In 1810, John Cotton appears in the Beaver County PA census. By 1814, he is the owner of 160 acres of land in Holmes County OH . Both John and Mary died in Salt Creek Township , Holmes County OH . John Cotton is known to have been buried in the Wolgamot Cemetery in Salt Creek Township .
Mary Ricketts Cotton, grandmother of Lucinda Haley Dorland, was the daughter of Cheney Ricketts (1732-15 May 1814) and Ann Cheney (1734-13 Sep 1813). Cheney Ricketts was born in Maryland Colony and died in Fairfield County OH . Ann was born in Prince George 's County MD and probably died in Fairfield County OH . Cheney Ricketts was the son of Edward Ricketts (1706-1786) and Mary Ann Cheney (?-?).
Edward's parents were Thomas Ricketts (20 Sep 1685- ?) and Rebecca Nicklisson (Nicholson) (19 April 1681- ?). Both Thomas and Rebecca were born in South River , Anne Arundel County MD. Rebecca's parents were John Nicklisson (1651-?) and Rebeckath _______ (1655-?). Both John and Rebeckath were born in South River as well.
Mary Ann Cheney (wife of Edward Ricketts) was the daughter of Charles Cheney Jr (1703-?) and Mary Powell (?-?). Charles Jr. was the son of Charles Cheney Sr. (6 Jun 1673/77-1745 ) and Anne Jones (1677/81-?). Both Charles Cheney Sr. and Anne Jones were born in Anne Arundel County MD. They were married 15 July 1701 . Therefore, we reach the conclusion that James Dorland was, through his mother's Haley, Cotton, Ricketts, Cheney and allied families, but two generations removed from Anne Arundel County MD, where his ancestors had lived for close to two hundred years prior to the arrival into central Ohio of James' maternal grandparents.
CAVE HILL CEMETERY, LOUISVILLE KY
James and Belle Ireland Dorland are buried in Cave Hill Cemetery in Louisville KY in a perpetual care plot, which James bought in 1895 at the time of Belle's death. They lie beneath a large granite monument James selected for them and located among the Ballards, Fields, Galts, Speeds, and other Louisville notables of the nineteenth century. Cecil V. Cook Jr. (1913-1970), grandson of James and Belle, and Cecil's wife Betty Taylor Cook (1918-2000) are also buried in the Dorland plot at Cave Hill.
SOURCES – PLEASE SEE: the OHIO CIVIL WAR GENEALOGY JOURNAL, Vol xiv Issue 1 (#53) 2010, pp. 24-25)
The illustrations (among dozens which are reproduced in All Of The Above I & II) are charcoal drawings, made by Leah Fanning Mebane from family photos.
OCWGJ EDITOR’S NOTES:
The 41st OVI participated in most of the major engagements in the Western Theater, from Shiloh to Nashville . Its first commander, William B. Hazen, became a brigade and division commander well-known for the day-long defense of his brigade’s position at Stones River . Its second commander, Acquila Wiley, was initially the commander of Dorland’s Company C, but rose to regimental command when Hazen was promoted. He was wounded at Shiloh and severely wounded at Missionary Ridge , suffering the amputation of a leg and causing his resignation from the service. Another of the initial company commanders, Emerson Opdycke, left the 41st for promotion to regimental commander of the 125th OVI, which gained its greatest honors filling a gap in the Union line near the cotton gin during a critical moment in the Battle of Franklin TN.
Although Stones River is not listed in the battles in which Dorland participated, it occurred during his period of service. It may be that he was away on other duty, or was not available due to illness. There is evidence that August 1862 recruits were with the regiment at Stones River , such as Albert McFarland of Company A, who enlisted on 30 Aug 1862 , and was killed on 31 Dec 1862 at Stones River .
The Official Roster of the Soldiers of the State of Ohio in the War of the Rebellion (Volume IV, page 179) lists Dorland’s enlistment date as 30 April 1862 , whereas the Dorland family information and his organizational pension index card both state his enlistment date as August 1862. It is likely that August is the correct date, which can be corroborated from his Compiled Military Service Record and pension file. Only one other person in the entire regiment, Theodore Hawley of Company B, has an enlistment date in April 1862, but he was an experienced recruit from the 19th OVI in the 3-months’ service. On the other hand, there are many enlistments shown for August 1862, including eight others in Company C alone.
The regimental history was published under the title The Forty-First Ohio Veteran Volunteer Infantry in The War of the Rebellion. 1861-1865. (Robert L. Kimberly and Ephraim S. Holloway, With the Co-operation of the Committee of the Regimental Association ... Cleveland , Ohio : W. R. Smellie, Printer and Publisher, 1897. Reprinted by Blue Acorn Press, Huntington WV , 1999.) Kimberly and Holloway were both veterans of the 41st who in succession commanded the regiment after Colonel Wiley, both promoted to Colonel and eventually Brevet Brigadier General. Their summary of the regiment’s service is as follows (page 292): “On a general summing up we find this Regiment traveled during the service 14,500 miles: 5,200 by water, 3,800 by rail, and 5,500 on foot. Was engaged in 20 battles, besides a great many skirmishes. Lost, 109 killed in battle, 69 died of wounds, 141 died of disease, and 3 killed by accidents; total, 322 deaths. There were 616 wounded that are known, and a great many more were slightly wounded, of which there is no record.”
Labels:
Anne Arundel,
Dorland,
Genealogy,
Ohio Civil War Veterans
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)