Showing posts with label same-sex. Show all posts
Showing posts with label same-sex. Show all posts

Friday, November 2, 2012

"No one should face discrimination under the law" - Baltimore Sun


The Baltimore Sun Has Endorsed 
Marriage Equality - 
Vote FOR Question Six in Maryland

Maryland's marriage equality law protects religious institutions while affirming the principle that no one should face discrimination under the law
The case for Question 6, which would affirm Maryland's law authorizing same-sex marriage, is simple. It upholds the principle that the law should treat everyone the same. Marriage is both a religious and a civil institution. Churches, synagogues and mosques have always set their own rules about which marriages they recognize, and this law does not change that fact. What it does is to ensure that no Marylander faces discrimination under the law when it comes to one of the state's fundamental institutions.
Opponents of the measure have sought to confuse the issue by warning of unintended consequences of marriage equality. They claim that those who, for religious reasons, oppose same-sex unions will be persecuted. That children will be taught about same-sex marriage in school against their parents' will. That it will somehow rob children of the best possible upbringing.
Those are no more than scare tactics.
[. . . ]

Civil unions and domestic partnerships in some states have sought to afford gay families the same packages of rights and benefits as married couples — a difficult and usually incomplete task, given the number of laws that reference marriage in one way or another. But that approach creates two kinds of marriage — one for straight people and one for gay people — and that inevitably relegates same-sex couples to second-class citizenship.
Maryland's marriage equality law protects the rights of religious institutions to set their own doctrine and practices, but it also affirms the principle that the state's civil laws should not foster discrimination. Everyone deserves to be treated equally under the law, and for that reason, we urge voters to support Question 6.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

Governor O'Malley: “ . . . the people of our state are supportive of protecting religious freedom and human dignity"



From this posting by the New York Times' By FRANK BRUNI:

[. . .]

"Martin O’Malley, the Democratic governor of Maryland, said on the phone last night [Aug 1 2012], that he expected Marylanders would indeed validate [Maryland's Civil Marriage Protection law], which he not only signed but campaigned vigorously for." 

"All along O’Malley sagely framed the issue not only in terms of basic human rights but also in terms of family values: specifically, the legal safeguards afforded children of same-sex couples, whose status as 'married' would be a force for stability."


Governor O'Malley: 
“I believe that the people of our state are supportive of protecting religious freedom and human dignity and protecting every child’s home equally under the law.”


"A new poll of Maryland voters, who will get to decide in November whether to overrule recently signed legislation establishing same-sex marriage in the state, shows that 54 percent favor the law, while 40 percent oppose it. These findings, by Hart Research Associates, will be released publicly later today [. . .].


"I’ve been watching this issue for years now, and I’ve never seen the pro-marriage-equality forces as determined and organized as they are now."

"It’s a big moment for them. It’s a big moment for all of us who believe that it’s only just and only fair for the law to recognize fully the unions of two men or two women who have a loving commitment to each other and aren’t doing anybody else one iota of harm."


Source:
Good news for Gay Marriage in Maryland - NYTimes.com



Friday, May 18, 2012

MARYLAND'S HIGHEST COURT: SAME SEX MARRIAGES RECOGNIZED IN MARYLAND (for purpose of ending one)



Ruling unanimously, the Maryland Court of Appeals announced on May 18 2012 that Maryland courts shall recognize same-sex marriages, for the purpose of considering a petition for divorce.



In this case, a local court had ruled to the contrary and the divorcing couple appealed.


This looks like a back-door through which same-sex couples may enter the mansion of matrimony. Well, maybe so. 


But the point is this: 


No citizens can be denied access 
to the courthouse 
in any state. 


This is certainly the case when a couple has been given court house access to marry. Neither Maryland nor any other state may pretend that marriage is not valid.


The underlying, broader issue is cause for celebration:


Same sex couples in Maryland should be 
- and will be - 
extended all of the civil rights that other couples enjoy, including 
the right to a civil marriage.


This judicial decision by Maryland's highest court is  one more powerful reason why Marylanders should  and likely will follow their consciences and recognize the civil rights of same-sex couples to marry.

SOURCE:



Maryland court recognizes same-sex marriages for purpose of divorce